Preprint scanner project / Issue 2026-08-12

Useful Chemistry

A weekly review of arXiv, ChemRxiv, and bioRxiv for ai-enabled methodological advances. Up to twenty papers reviewed every week; a quiet week may publish none.

07 selected / 19 reviewed Aug 5, 2026–Aug 11, 2026
Groups
Group roll call
96 followed groups Research-group roll call
  • Milad Abolhasani Abolhasani Lab North Carolina State University Site ↗
  • Surl-Hee (Shirley) Ahn Ahn Lab University of California, Davis Site ↗
  • Mohammed AlQuraishi AlQuraishi Laboratory Columbia University Site ↗
  • Sayan Banerjee Banerjee Group University of Tennessee, Knoxville Site ↗
  • Christopher J. Bartel Bartel Research Group University of Minnesota Twin Cities Site ↗
  • Jan-Niklas Boyn Boyn Research Group University of Minnesota Twin Cities Site ↗
  • Ting Cao Cao Group University of Washington Site ↗
  • Timothy Cernak Cernak Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Ming Chen Ming Chen Group Purdue University Site ↗
  • Po-Yen Chen Chen Research Group University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Bingqing Cheng Cheng Group University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Brian Cleary Algorithmic Lens on Experimental Biology Laboratory Boston University Site ↗
  • Connor W. Coley Coley Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Yamil J. Colón Colón Group University of Notre Dame Site ↗
  • César de la Fuente Machine Biology Group University of Pennsylvania Site ↗
  • Julia Dshemuchadse Cape Crystal Cornell University Site ↗
  • Thomas P. Fay Fay Group University of California, Los Angeles Site ↗
  • Kara D. Fong Fong Lab California Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Thomas E. Gartner III Gartner Group Lehigh University Site ↗
  • Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli Learning Matter Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Jonathan Gootenberg Gootenberg Laboratory Harvard University Site ↗
  • Prashun Gorai 3D Materials Lab Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Site ↗
  • Diptarka Hait Hait Group Columbia University Site ↗
  • Brian Hie Laboratory of Evolutionary Design Stanford University Site ↗
  • Guoxiang Hu Hu Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Yong-Jie Hu Materials Computation and Informatics Group Drexel University Site ↗
  • Yifei Huang Huang Lab Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Yunha Hwang Hwang Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Nicholas E. Jackson AI for Materials Group University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Site ↗
  • William M. Jacobs Jacobs Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Dipti Jasrasaria Jasrasaria Group University of Chicago Site ↗
  • Anupama Jha Jha Lab Yale University Site ↗
  • Kaiyi Jiang Jiang Lab Princeton University Site ↗
  • Adrian Jinich Jinich Lab University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Felipe Jornada Jornada Research Group Stanford University Site ↗
  • Kalli Kappel Kappel Lab University of California, Los Angeles Site ↗
  • Joshua Kretchmer Kretchmer Research Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Aditi S. Krishnapriyan Krishnapriyan Research Group University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Sebastian Kube Kube Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Heather J. Kulik Kulik Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Ambarish R. Kulkarni Kulkarni Research Group University of California, Davis Site ↗
  • Joseph S. Kwon Kwon Research Group The Ohio State University Site ↗
  • Joonho Lee Lee Group Harvard University Site ↗
  • Can Li Li Research Group Purdue University Site ↗
  • Wanlu Li Wanlu Li Research Group University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Rebecca K. Lindsey Lindsey Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Ge Liu Ge Liu Group University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Site ↗
  • Yuanyue Liu Yuanyue Liu Group The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Yang Lu Lu Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Jiankun Lyu Evnin Family Laboratory of Computational Molecular Discovery The Rockefeller University Site ↗
  • Cong Ma Cong Ma Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Arkajit Mandal Mandal Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Andrew J. Medford Medford Research Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Ilias Mitrai Systems and AI Lab The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Jeetain Mittal Mittal Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Joel A. Paulson Paulson Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Elisa Pieri Pieri Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Site ↗
  • Doran Raccah MesoScience Lab The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Phillip Rauscher Rauscher Group New York University Site ↗
  • Wesley Reinhart Reinhart Group Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Gabriel J. Rocklin Rocklin Lab Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Andrew S. Rosen Rosen Research Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Grant M. Rotskoff Rotskoff Group Stanford University Site ↗
  • Janani Sampath Sampath Research Group University of Florida Site ↗
  • Elvira Sayfutyarova Sayfutyarova Group Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Martin Seifrid Seifrid Group North Carolina State University Site ↗
  • Thomas P. Senftle Senftle Group Rice University Site ↗
  • Karthik Shekhar Shekhar Lab University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Zachary M. Sherman Z Lab University of Washington Site ↗
  • Krishna Shrinivas Shrinivas Lab Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Rohit Singh Singh Lab Duke University Site ↗
  • Micheline Soley Soley Group University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Kevin V. Solomon Solomon Laboratory University of Delaware Site ↗
  • Jeff Spence Spence Lab University of California, San Francisco Site ↗
  • Kayla G. Sprenger Rational Design of Interfaces Lab University of Colorado Boulder Site ↗
  • Chong Sun Sun Lab Rutgers University–New Brunswick Site ↗
  • Yidan Sun Sun Lab Washington University in St. Louis Site ↗
  • Daniel Tabor Tabor Research Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Ming Tang Mesoscale Materials Science Group Rice University Site ↗
  • Roel Tempelaar Tempelaar Team Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Erik Thiede Thiede Lab Cornell University Site ↗
  • Pratyush Tiwary Artificial Chemical Intelligence@Maryland University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Brian Trippe Trippe Lab Stanford University Site ↗
  • Alexander Urban Urban Research Group Columbia University Site ↗
  • David Van Valen Van Valen Lab California Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Vojtech Vlcek Vlcek Group University of California, Santa Barbara Site ↗
  • Allon Wagner Wagner Lab University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Shunzhi Wang Wang Lab New York University Site ↗
  • Michael A. Webb Webb Research Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Mingjian Wen Wen Research Group University of Houston Site ↗
  • Hong-Zhou Ye Ye Group University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Shuwen Yue Yue Research Group Cornell University Site ↗
  • Daiwei (David) Zhang Daiwei Zhang Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Site ↗
  • Hongbo Zhao Zhao Research Group University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Jian Zhou Zhou Lab University of Chicago Site ↗
  • Tianyu Zhu Zhu Group Yale University Site ↗

Issue 2026-08-12

Highlights from this week

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Physics-Based Molecular Fingerprints from Spectral Graph Theory Provide Efficient Geometry-Aware Measures of Chemical Similarity

These fingerprints build a complete molecular graph with weighted edges, then use Laplacian eigenvalues to encode three-dimensional structure. With community detection, the authors observe strong performance against representative baselines across datasets spanning organic, inorganic, biological, reticular, and reaction chemistry. It gives large-scale similarity work a fixed-length, interpretable way to retain information from molecular geometry.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Materials representationMolecular representation
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

A Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics of Polymers

The framework uses a polymer specification and target resolution to coordinate topology building, equilibration, coarse-grained mapping, potential derivation, and validation. Across 27 polymer tasks, the authors report matching density within 5 percent in 22 and reducing simulation to 1 minute. This points toward faster preparation of polymer models tied to an atomistic reference.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Atomistic modelingMultiscale modelingScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

RxnCLF: Contrastive Transformation-Aware Reaction Foundation Model for Improved Reactivity Prediction

The authors describe RxnCLF as a self-supervised contrastive framework that brings reactant and product information into a single condensed reaction graph. Across multiple yield prediction benchmarks, the authors report that RxnCLF improves R2 while outperforming graph- and sequence-based baselines. These results suggest that a scalable model built around transformations may help yield prediction extend to broader reaction spaces.

AI–chemistry Foundation modelsMolecular representationReaction modeling
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Boltz-Perturb: Improving Diversity and Accuracy in Protein-Ligand Co-Folding through Training-Free Conditioning Perturbation

The authors introduce Boltz-Perturb, which perturbs conditioning signals during inference. Across diverse protein-ligand systems, the authors report that TCP improves top-20 oracle success rates by 2.6 to 7.8 fold. The result suggests that inference-time perturbation can make diverse binding modes more accessible without costly retraining.

AI–biochemistryAI–chemistry Biomolecular structureFoundation models
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Agent-MD: Selective LLM Intervention with Event-Driven Escalation for Stateful GCMC--MD Campaigns

The system reserves language-model reasoning for campaign construction and event-triggered review while a persistent rule-based agent handles simulation, continuation, archiving, and state progression. The authors report 120 segmented simulation cycles across 15 system states, with routine production requiring no live reasoning-agent invocation. Selective review offers a practical division between interpretation and repeatable campaign operations.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Atomistic modelingMultiscale modelingScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Move BeTween modAlities (MBTA) employs flow matching to predict single cell data modalities

The framework maintains modality-specific latent spaces and connects them through flow matching for cross-modal translation. The authors report that it outperformed existing methods across extensive multi-modal single-cell benchmarks, especially where structural mismatch was pronounced. This preserves distinctions between measurements while making their relationships computationally accessible.

AI–biochemistry Molecular representationSurrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Coevolution-informed Bayesian optimization for sample-efficient protein design

The method uses coevolutionary statistics to featurize candidates within Bayesian optimization of a generative latent sequence landscape. On a virtual fluorescence benchmark, the authors report reaching the optimum in about 40 evaluations and exceeding language-model embeddings and raw latent coordinates. A smooth design coordinate could make scarce experimental evaluations go further in protein engineering.

AI–biochemistry Biomolecular designGenerative designProtein engineeringSurrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint