Preprint scanner project / Issue 2026-08-12

Useful Chemistry

A weekly review of arXiv, ChemRxiv, and bioRxiv for ai-enabled methodological advances. Up to twenty papers reviewed every week; a quiet week may publish none.

07 selected / 19 reviewed Aug 5, 2026–Aug 11, 2026
Groups
Group roll call
96 followed groups Research-group roll call
  • Milad Abolhasani Abolhasani Lab North Carolina State University Site ↗
  • Surl-Hee (Shirley) Ahn Ahn Lab University of California, Davis Site ↗
  • Mohammed AlQuraishi AlQuraishi Laboratory Columbia University Site ↗
  • Sayan Banerjee Banerjee Group University of Tennessee, Knoxville Site ↗
  • Christopher J. Bartel Bartel Research Group University of Minnesota Twin Cities Site ↗
  • Jan-Niklas Boyn Boyn Research Group University of Minnesota Twin Cities Site ↗
  • Ting Cao Cao Group University of Washington Site ↗
  • Timothy Cernak Cernak Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Ming Chen Ming Chen Group Purdue University Site ↗
  • Po-Yen Chen Chen Research Group University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Bingqing Cheng Cheng Group University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Brian Cleary Algorithmic Lens on Experimental Biology Laboratory Boston University Site ↗
  • Connor W. Coley Coley Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Yamil J. Colón Colón Group University of Notre Dame Site ↗
  • César de la Fuente Machine Biology Group University of Pennsylvania Site ↗
  • Julia Dshemuchadse Cape Crystal Cornell University Site ↗
  • Thomas P. Fay Fay Group University of California, Los Angeles Site ↗
  • Kara D. Fong Fong Lab California Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Thomas E. Gartner III Gartner Group Lehigh University Site ↗
  • Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli Learning Matter Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Jonathan Gootenberg Gootenberg Laboratory Harvard University Site ↗
  • Prashun Gorai 3D Materials Lab Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Site ↗
  • Diptarka Hait Hait Group Columbia University Site ↗
  • Brian Hie Laboratory of Evolutionary Design Stanford University Site ↗
  • Guoxiang Hu Hu Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Yong-Jie Hu Materials Computation and Informatics Group Drexel University Site ↗
  • Yifei Huang Huang Lab Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Yunha Hwang Hwang Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Nicholas E. Jackson AI for Materials Group University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Site ↗
  • William M. Jacobs Jacobs Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Dipti Jasrasaria Jasrasaria Group University of Chicago Site ↗
  • Anupama Jha Jha Lab Yale University Site ↗
  • Kaiyi Jiang Jiang Lab Princeton University Site ↗
  • Adrian Jinich Jinich Lab University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Felipe Jornada Jornada Research Group Stanford University Site ↗
  • Kalli Kappel Kappel Lab University of California, Los Angeles Site ↗
  • Joshua Kretchmer Kretchmer Research Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Aditi S. Krishnapriyan Krishnapriyan Research Group University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Sebastian Kube Kube Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Heather J. Kulik Kulik Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Ambarish R. Kulkarni Kulkarni Research Group University of California, Davis Site ↗
  • Joseph S. Kwon Kwon Research Group The Ohio State University Site ↗
  • Joonho Lee Lee Group Harvard University Site ↗
  • Can Li Li Research Group Purdue University Site ↗
  • Wanlu Li Wanlu Li Research Group University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Rebecca K. Lindsey Lindsey Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Ge Liu Ge Liu Group University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Site ↗
  • Yuanyue Liu Yuanyue Liu Group The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Yang Lu Lu Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Jiankun Lyu Evnin Family Laboratory of Computational Molecular Discovery The Rockefeller University Site ↗
  • Cong Ma Cong Ma Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Arkajit Mandal Mandal Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Andrew J. Medford Medford Research Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Ilias Mitrai Systems and AI Lab The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Jeetain Mittal Mittal Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Joel A. Paulson Paulson Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Elisa Pieri Pieri Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Site ↗
  • Doran Raccah MesoScience Lab The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Phillip Rauscher Rauscher Group New York University Site ↗
  • Wesley Reinhart Reinhart Group Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Gabriel J. Rocklin Rocklin Lab Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Andrew S. Rosen Rosen Research Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Grant M. Rotskoff Rotskoff Group Stanford University Site ↗
  • Janani Sampath Sampath Research Group University of Florida Site ↗
  • Elvira Sayfutyarova Sayfutyarova Group Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Martin Seifrid Seifrid Group North Carolina State University Site ↗
  • Thomas P. Senftle Senftle Group Rice University Site ↗
  • Karthik Shekhar Shekhar Lab University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Zachary M. Sherman Z Lab University of Washington Site ↗
  • Krishna Shrinivas Shrinivas Lab Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Rohit Singh Singh Lab Duke University Site ↗
  • Micheline Soley Soley Group University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Kevin V. Solomon Solomon Laboratory University of Delaware Site ↗
  • Jeff Spence Spence Lab University of California, San Francisco Site ↗
  • Kayla G. Sprenger Rational Design of Interfaces Lab University of Colorado Boulder Site ↗
  • Chong Sun Sun Lab Rutgers University–New Brunswick Site ↗
  • Yidan Sun Sun Lab Washington University in St. Louis Site ↗
  • Daniel Tabor Tabor Research Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Ming Tang Mesoscale Materials Science Group Rice University Site ↗
  • Roel Tempelaar Tempelaar Team Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Erik Thiede Thiede Lab Cornell University Site ↗
  • Pratyush Tiwary Artificial Chemical Intelligence@Maryland University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Brian Trippe Trippe Lab Stanford University Site ↗
  • Alexander Urban Urban Research Group Columbia University Site ↗
  • David Van Valen Van Valen Lab California Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Vojtech Vlcek Vlcek Group University of California, Santa Barbara Site ↗
  • Allon Wagner Wagner Lab University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Shunzhi Wang Wang Lab New York University Site ↗
  • Michael A. Webb Webb Research Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Mingjian Wen Wen Research Group University of Houston Site ↗
  • Hong-Zhou Ye Ye Group University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Shuwen Yue Yue Research Group Cornell University Site ↗
  • Daiwei (David) Zhang Daiwei Zhang Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Site ↗
  • Hongbo Zhao Zhao Research Group University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Jian Zhou Zhou Lab University of Chicago Site ↗
  • Tianyu Zhu Zhu Group Yale University Site ↗

Issue 2026-08-12

Highlights from this week

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Physics-Based Molecular Fingerprints from Spectral Graph Theory Provide Efficient Geometry-Aware Measures of Chemical Similarity

The authors construct fixed-length molecular fingerprints from spectral graph theory using three-dimensional interaction-weighted graphs. The authors report strong benchmark performance across organic, inorganic, biological, reticular, and reaction-chemistry datasets while distinguishing structures with identical two-dimensional connectivity. This matters because an interpretable representation of three-dimensional similarity could scale beyond pairwise descriptors without depending on learned embedding coverage.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Materials representationMolecular representation
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

A Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics of Polymers

CGMas coordinates agents for polymer topology construction, equilibration, coarse-graining, potential derivation, and validation from a natural-language specification. The authors report completion of all 27 polymer tasks, density agreement within five percent in 22 cases, and a reduction in simulation time to one minute. This matters because automated coarse-graining could make polymer models easier to build for mappings that otherwise require bespoke work.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Atomistic modelingMultiscale modelingScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

RxnCLF: Contrastive Transformation-Aware Reaction Foundation Model for Improved Reactivity Prediction

RxnCLF pretrains a reaction foundation model on condensed graphs that unify reactant and product information into an explicit transformation representation. The authors report improved yield-prediction performance over graph and sequence baselines across several reaction benchmarks. This matters because reaction representations that retain both centers and surrounding context may transfer to a wider range of reaction-informatics tasks.

AI–chemistry Foundation modelsMolecular representationReaction modeling
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Boltz-Perturb: Improving Diversity and Accuracy in Protein-Ligand Co-Folding through Training-Free Conditioning Perturbation

Boltz-Perturb perturbs model-conditioning signals during inference through Token Bias Perturbation and Token Conditioning Perturbation, increasing exploration of alternative protein-ligand binding poses. Across diverse protein-ligand systems, the authors report that token conditioning improved top-20 oracle success rates by 2.6- to 7.8-fold, while Boltz-Perturb required over 75% less compute than the Boltz-2 high diffusion temperature variant. The method makes latent binding-mode diversity accessible without retraining, so a sampling deficiency can be addressed directly during co-folding inference.

AI–biochemistryAI–chemistry Biomolecular structureFoundation models
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Agent-MD: Selective LLM Intervention with Event-Driven Escalation for Stateful GCMC--MD Campaigns

Agent-MD reserves language-model reasoning for campaign setup and event-triggered review while a persistent rule-based agent manages routine molecular-simulation operations. The authors report 120 segmented simulation cycles across 15 system-humidity states without live reasoning during production, with replay identifying workflow problems at review boundaries. This separation could make long-running simulations more auditable without turning every routine control action into a model decision.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Atomistic modelingMultiscale modelingScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Move BeTween modAlities (MBTA) employs flow matching to predict single cell data modalities

MBTA maintains modality-specific latent spaces and connects them via flow matching, preserving the structure of each modality while enabling cross-modal translation. Across multimodal single-cell benchmarks, the authors report that MBTA outperformed existing methods most strongly where structural mismatch was pronounced and identified transcriptomic lineage relationships corroborated by genomic variation in breast cancer profiles. By linking multiple molecular readouts without erasing their individual structure, the framework makes those structural differences usable in layered descriptions of cellular identity.

AI–biochemistry Molecular representationSurrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Coevolution-informed Bayesian optimization for sample-efficient protein design

ALSEBO couples Bayesian optimization to a generative protein-sequence landscape using direct-coupling-analysis coevolutionary features. The authors report reaching the avGFP optimum in about forty evaluations and transferring the approach to divergent GFPs and a non-GFP enzyme. This matters because a better low-data fitness representation can reduce the experimental cost of protein design.

AI–biochemistry Biomolecular designGenerative designProtein engineeringSurrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint