Preprint scanner project / Issue 2026-09-23

Useful Chemistry

A weekly review of arXiv, ChemRxiv, and bioRxiv for ai-enabled methodological advances. Up to twenty papers reviewed every week; a quiet week may publish none.

20 selected / 129 reviewed Sep 16, 2026–Sep 22, 2026
Groups
Group roll call
96 followed groups Research-group roll call
  • Milad Abolhasani Abolhasani Lab North Carolina State University Site ↗
  • Surl-Hee (Shirley) Ahn Ahn Lab University of California, Davis Site ↗
  • Mohammed AlQuraishi AlQuraishi Laboratory Columbia University Site ↗
  • Sayan Banerjee Banerjee Group University of Tennessee, Knoxville Site ↗
  • Christopher J. Bartel Bartel Research Group University of Minnesota Twin Cities Site ↗
  • Jan-Niklas Boyn Boyn Research Group University of Minnesota Twin Cities Site ↗
  • Ting Cao Cao Group University of Washington Site ↗
  • Timothy Cernak Cernak Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Ming Chen Ming Chen Group Purdue University Site ↗
  • Po-Yen Chen Chen Research Group University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Bingqing Cheng Cheng Group University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Brian Cleary Algorithmic Lens on Experimental Biology Laboratory Boston University Site ↗
  • Connor W. Coley Coley Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Yamil J. Colón Colón Group University of Notre Dame Site ↗
  • César de la Fuente Machine Biology Group University of Pennsylvania Site ↗
  • Julia Dshemuchadse Cape Crystal Cornell University Site ↗
  • Thomas P. Fay Fay Group University of California, Los Angeles Site ↗
  • Kara D. Fong Fong Lab California Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Thomas E. Gartner III Gartner Group Lehigh University Site ↗
  • Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli Learning Matter Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Jonathan Gootenberg Gootenberg Laboratory Harvard University Site ↗
  • Prashun Gorai 3D Materials Lab Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Site ↗
  • Diptarka Hait Hait Group Columbia University Site ↗
  • Brian Hie Laboratory of Evolutionary Design Stanford University Site ↗
  • Guoxiang Hu Hu Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Yong-Jie Hu Materials Computation and Informatics Group Drexel University Site ↗
  • Yifei Huang Huang Lab Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Yunha Hwang Hwang Lab Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Nicholas E. Jackson AI for Materials Group University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Site ↗
  • William M. Jacobs Jacobs Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Dipti Jasrasaria Jasrasaria Group University of Chicago Site ↗
  • Anupama Jha Jha Lab Yale University Site ↗
  • Kaiyi Jiang Jiang Lab Princeton University Site ↗
  • Adrian Jinich Jinich Lab University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Felipe Jornada Jornada Research Group Stanford University Site ↗
  • Kalli Kappel Kappel Lab University of California, Los Angeles Site ↗
  • Joshua Kretchmer Kretchmer Research Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Aditi S. Krishnapriyan Krishnapriyan Research Group University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Sebastian Kube Kube Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Heather J. Kulik Kulik Research Group Massachusetts Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Ambarish R. Kulkarni Kulkarni Research Group University of California, Davis Site ↗
  • Joseph S. Kwon Kwon Research Group The Ohio State University Site ↗
  • Joonho Lee Lee Group Harvard University Site ↗
  • Can Li Li Research Group Purdue University Site ↗
  • Wanlu Li Wanlu Li Research Group University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Rebecca K. Lindsey Lindsey Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Ge Liu Ge Liu Group University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Site ↗
  • Yuanyue Liu Yuanyue Liu Group The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Yang Lu Lu Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Jiankun Lyu Evnin Family Laboratory of Computational Molecular Discovery The Rockefeller University Site ↗
  • Cong Ma Cong Ma Lab University of Michigan Site ↗
  • Arkajit Mandal Mandal Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Andrew J. Medford Medford Research Group Georgia Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Ilias Mitrai Systems and AI Lab The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Jeetain Mittal Mittal Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Joel A. Paulson Paulson Lab University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Elisa Pieri Pieri Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Site ↗
  • Doran Raccah MesoScience Lab The University of Texas at Austin Site ↗
  • Phillip Rauscher Rauscher Group New York University Site ↗
  • Wesley Reinhart Reinhart Group Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Gabriel J. Rocklin Rocklin Lab Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Andrew S. Rosen Rosen Research Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Grant M. Rotskoff Rotskoff Group Stanford University Site ↗
  • Janani Sampath Sampath Research Group University of Florida Site ↗
  • Elvira Sayfutyarova Sayfutyarova Group Pennsylvania State University Site ↗
  • Martin Seifrid Seifrid Group North Carolina State University Site ↗
  • Thomas P. Senftle Senftle Group Rice University Site ↗
  • Karthik Shekhar Shekhar Lab University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Zachary M. Sherman Z Lab University of Washington Site ↗
  • Krishna Shrinivas Shrinivas Lab Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Rohit Singh Singh Lab Duke University Site ↗
  • Micheline Soley Soley Group University of Wisconsin–Madison Site ↗
  • Kevin V. Solomon Solomon Laboratory University of Delaware Site ↗
  • Jeff Spence Spence Lab University of California, San Francisco Site ↗
  • Kayla G. Sprenger Rational Design of Interfaces Lab University of Colorado Boulder Site ↗
  • Chong Sun Sun Lab Rutgers University–New Brunswick Site ↗
  • Yidan Sun Sun Lab Washington University in St. Louis Site ↗
  • Daniel Tabor Tabor Research Group Texas A&M University Site ↗
  • Ming Tang Mesoscale Materials Science Group Rice University Site ↗
  • Roel Tempelaar Tempelaar Team Northwestern University Site ↗
  • Erik Thiede Thiede Lab Cornell University Site ↗
  • Pratyush Tiwary Artificial Chemical Intelligence@Maryland University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Brian Trippe Trippe Lab Stanford University Site ↗
  • Alexander Urban Urban Research Group Columbia University Site ↗
  • David Van Valen Van Valen Lab California Institute of Technology Site ↗
  • Vojtech Vlcek Vlcek Group University of California, Santa Barbara Site ↗
  • Allon Wagner Wagner Lab University of California, Berkeley Site ↗
  • Shunzhi Wang Wang Lab New York University Site ↗
  • Michael A. Webb Webb Research Group Princeton University Site ↗
  • Mingjian Wen Wen Research Group University of Houston Site ↗
  • Hong-Zhou Ye Ye Group University of Maryland, College Park Site ↗
  • Shuwen Yue Yue Research Group Cornell University Site ↗
  • Daiwei (David) Zhang Daiwei Zhang Lab University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Site ↗
  • Hongbo Zhao Zhao Research Group University of California, San Diego Site ↗
  • Jian Zhou Zhou Lab University of Chicago Site ↗
  • Tianyu Zhu Zhu Group Yale University Site ↗

Issue 2026-09-23

Highlights from this week

Preprint—not peer reviewed

A Unified 3D Generative Model for Synthesizable Structure-Based Drug Design

The authors introduce a programmable generative framework for docking, fragment design, and de novo drug design. They report experimental validation of designed or optimized ligands for five protein targets. The framework may make targeted small-molecule and non-natural-peptide design more flexible.

AI–biochemistryAI–chemistry Biomolecular designGenerative design
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Latent generative search unlocks de novo design of untapped biomolecular interactions at scale

The authors introduce a latent generative search framework that applies reward-guided inference-time search to steer Proteina-Complexa. They report more validated binders than other tested methods in a multiplexed phage-display screen exceeding a million designs. The authors suggest the approach can reach polar, flexible targets that have resisted previous de novo binder methods.

AI–biochemistry Biomolecular designGenerative design
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

ALIGNN 2.0: A Unified Line-Graph Neural Network Framework for Materials Screening, Force Fields, Inverse Design, Spectroscopy, and Microscopy

The authors present ALIGNN 2.0, a dependency-free pure-PyTorch reimplementation that unifies property and force-field prediction in a single graph. They report ALIGNN 2.0 led the original ALIGNN on most single-property JARVIS-Leaderboard benchmarks. The authors suggest a common graph pipeline could improve portability and reproducibility across materials predictions.

AI–materials Generative designMaterials representationNeural potentials
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

ECENet: An Edge Cluster Expansion Line-Graph Neural Network

The authors introduce ECENet, an edge-centered line-graph neural network built on edge cluster expansion. They report state-of-the-art performance on MD22 and an accuracy-cost Pareto-frontier position after training on SPICE-MACE-OFF. The authors position edge-centered representations as an efficient foundation for physically expressive interatomic potentials.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Molecular representationNeural potentials
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Rachel: A general-purpose language model directs and revises retrosynthetic routes

The authors developed Rachel, a stateful environment that executes and checks LLM-directed chemistry without setting a search policy or stopping rule. They report strict route closure across both evaluated cohorts without supplied reference routes. The authors suggest recorded revisions can carry a changed strategy into subsequent planning steps.

AI–chemistry Scientific agentsSynthesis planning
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Learning continuous reaction paths for transition-state prediction

The authors introduce a two-stage framework that learns a continuous reaction path before refining a transition-state candidate. They report frequency-confirmed first-order saddle-point candidates for 405 of 410 predictions. Treating paths as reusable representations could connect prediction with mechanistic interpretation and quantum refinement.

AI–chemistry Reaction modeling
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Hypothesis-Driven Autonomous Materials Synthesis with Multimodal LLM Agents

The authors use language-model agents to run automated experiments and maintain revisable synthesis understanding. They report 18 autonomous deposition experiments that identified a narrow optimal growth window. This approach makes testable explanations, rather than optimized samples alone, an output of autonomous synthesis.

AI–materials Autonomous labsScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Complete Neural Electronic Initialization Accelerates Materials DFT

The authors combine models for valence density, augmentation occupancies, and spin initialization into a reference-free electronic initializer. They report reducing end-to-end density-functional calculation time on unseen structures while preserving converged energies. Complete electronic initialization could remove a practical bottleneck in accelerated materials calculations.

AI–materials Electronic structureSurrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Physics-residual machine learning predicts oxygen-evolution catalyst activity beyond the training range from sparse polarization measurements

The authors predict catalyst endpoints by combining a Tafel term with a residual learned from labelled catalysts. They report lower error for the Ni-Ru library than the data-driven models tested. This approach could support catalyst selection beyond the measured portion of polarization curves.

AI–chemistry Surrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Machine learned potentials with electrostatic embedding accurately capture Kemp eliminase reactivity

The authors trained a MACE MLIP with EMLE embedding for simulations of enzymatic, base-catalysed Kemp elimination. They report their EMLE ML/MM scheme captured the experimental barrier difference between a designed Kemp eliminase and its evolved counterpart. The authors suggest transfer from a single enzyme variant can support barrier assessment during computational screening.

AI–biochemistryAI–chemistry Neural potentialsReaction modeling
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Topology-Stratified Materials Discovery with A Flow-Based Generative Model

The authors present UFO-MGen, a flow-based model that uses topological information from Wyckoff representations to generate crystals. They report the highest generation-success and SUN rates under a multi-stability evaluation. The authors suggest its property-constrained generation could aid inverse materials design.

AI–materials Generative designMaterials representation
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Agentic AI for Density-Functional Development: Revisiting r2SCAN

The authors demonstrate physics-constrained agentic development of a meta-GGA functional using an LLM to assist an r2SCAN revision. They report fewer downstream rejections than uniform random search and stronger high-response candidates. The authors conclude that agentic search can support density-functional development when coupled to automated physical verification.

AI–chemistryAI–materials Electronic structureScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

miRstring: An RNA language model enables mature miRNA decoding and artificial small RNA design across species

The authors present miRstring, a biogenesis-aware RNA language framework for decoding the boundaries of an miRNA duplex. They report designed precursor scaffolds repressed target mRNAs. The authors suggest miRstring could connect cross-species annotation with artificial miRNA design.

AI–biochemistry Biomolecular designFoundation models
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Agent-E2MD: Autonomous Translation of Interatomic Potential Equations into Physically Validated Pair Styles for Molecular Dynamics in LAMMPS

The authors introduce an agentic workflow that translates interatomic models into executable LAMMPS pair styles. They report matching reference energies and forces for all seven tested material-potential pairs. The workflow may move effort from routine implementation toward model definition and physical validation.

AI–materials Atomistic modelingScientific agents
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

An open benchmark for machine learning-based polymer property prediction

The authors introduce PolyBench26, an open dataset for polymer property prediction spanning homopolymers and copolymers. They report graph-based models had the lowest prediction errors and retained their advantage as training-set size varied. The authors position the benchmark as a reproducible basis for models addressing complex polymer design.

AI–materials Datasets + benchmarks
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Accelerated discovery of thermostable vaccines using data-efficient AI

The authors couple high-throughput experiments with Bayesian optimization to identify thermostable messenger-RNA nanoparticle formulations. They report retained bioactivity after storage at body temperature for over two months. This could help develop vaccine formulations that reduce dependence on ultra-cold storage.

AI–biochemistry Autonomous labs
Abstract brief CC BY Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

AutoRASOR: Autonomous Rapid Scanning Electron Microscope Operator

The authors introduce an autonomous scanning-electron-microscopy pipeline that embeds micrographs and selects regions of interest. They report that ambiguity-based sampling captured more diverse and rare morphologies than random selection. This can shift automated microscopy toward general morphological surveys of unknown materials.

AI–materials Autonomous labs
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

SPIBER: Reconstructing Free Energy Landscapes from Short, Unconverged Trajectories with Generative Flow Networks

The authors present SPIBER, joining SPIB with GFlowNets to reconstruct free-energy landscapes from short trajectories. They report free-energy differences recovered within a thermal-energy unit of reference values for a particle, alanine dipeptide, and AIB9. The authors suggest the method can estimate free energies without converged state populations or added molecular-dynamics simulations.

AI–chemistry Atomistic modelingGenerative design
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

GenVoid: Uncertainty-Aware Learning of Subsurface Material Defects with an Experimentally Validated Physics-Informed Generative Model

The authors introduce a physics-informed generative framework for locating internal voids from surface displacement measurements. They demonstrate inference from both synthetic data and experimentally measured displacement fields. Its uncertainty-aware reconstructions could help design measurements for non-invasive defect characterization.

AI–materials Multiscale modelingSurrogate modeling
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint

Preprint—not peer reviewed

Tool-Augmented On-Policy Distillation for LLM Domain Adaptation in Sequence-Based Omics Tasks

The authors introduce OmicsBench to test reasoning about multi-omics sequences using traceable evidence chains. They report that TA-OPD strengthened biological evidence grounding while improving prediction on most tasks across the tested Qwen3.5 models. The authors suggest the benchmark and post-training approach could help identify reasoning failures in multi-omics models.

AI–biochemistry Datasets + benchmarksFoundation models
Abstract brief CC0 Preprint